Project - Versions
Hi,
I am Yaron from Mobileye-Israel. We have a licensed Gemini.
I have a question about the structure of a project -version. We would like to add a layer between project and version. this layer called "Release" so we will have project - has Releases and a release will have versions. Can we do it in the Gemini we have. (2.0.5)
Yaron
|
yaron
· 1 |
|
| Wednesday, November 8, 2006, 8:34:51 AM | |
0
|
No sure what are after here. In Gemini you have a Project, this will have versions, some released and some not. Do you want to have different versions of a project? |
||||
|
|||||
0
|
I asked the customer to explain exactly what he needs, here is his explanation : I want to have a new entity, that will be related to a project, and that a version can be related to it. I want to name this entity: Release. Regards, Yaron
|
||||
|
|||||
0
|
Hi, I have another important question : After I changed the "AllowAnonUser" to "NO", after creating issue I am logged out automatically by the system. How do I solve that, it is disturbing my users !! Yaron |
||||
|
|||||
0
|
Is this occuring all the time? Please check the FullGeminiURL setting. |
||||
|
|||||
0
|
Hi, as for the question about the fact that after creating an issue and your reqest that I check the ful gemini url, here is what is wrritten in the web.config (I changed the ip adress to the "IpAddress" <!-- FullGeminiURL - requires trailing forward-slash! --> I did not touch it. the only change I have made is the "NO" for the anon user. 2. please answer also my question about the adding "Release" between version and project. 3. Task/bug/Report status flow (Maintenance ) Is it possible to create different flows for bug/task/report in the system. because for Bug it is very long and for task it is very short. It is taking a lot of time to pass all phases of a task while it needs only 2 phases only. 4. Issue fields Can we ignore some fileds of issue ? Fields that are not relevant for us at all. ? Regards,Yaron
|
||||
|
|||||
0
|
Hi, I deleted some of the issue priority and then the system is failed. That means that I removed the priority and it's ID was not removed from the isspriority field in the issue table. if the connections in the data base are not defined properly at least do not allow user to delete this field. this is a bug and should be fixed. Yaron |
||||
|
|||||
0
|
|
||||
|
|||||
0
|
This will be fixed in 2.1. |
||||
|
|||||




